1. By imc on January 13 2010 at 01:34 (1:34 AM) ET 5 days after you received this alert (and less than 2 days day after you shared it) there's been an enormous earthquake in Haiti that's all over the news.
2. By Niv on January 14 2010 at 12:52 (12:52 PM) ET Yeah I thought it was about Hairi too for a moment there. Yet that being said maybe adding the time frame to message was a bit 'forceful'? I recently wnt through a similar thing with tarot where a lady explained to me that specifying a time frame will get you something roughly around that frame as opposed to the exact frame you wanted. Maybe it was sending you the only option it had on hand? A correct message with a not so correct time table. Has this message popped up again? Were you thinking of anything related to EQs? What would you say your emotional state was?
3. By imc on January 14 2010 at 13:14 (1:14 PM) ET Re Niv: From what I've seen, this phenomenon of getting approximate but not exact correlations seems generally common in psi effects. (Not just correlations in time, like this one, but correlations along other yardsticks as well.) It's interesting to ponder why this happens. A skeptic would argue that accepting approximate correlations as evidence of psi constitutes intellectual sloppiness (e.g. if you sufficiently broaden your target, then you can call everything a bull's eye). But often, the improbability even of these approximate correlations is highly significant.
4. By jaw on January 14 2010 at 14:15 (2:15 PM) ET This is a very interesting conversation here. @imc, "correlations along other yardsticks as well." Well said. It is fascinating to think about the timing of SyncTXT messages. I was just thinking, wouldn't it be cool if we receive the "information" such that we have just enough time to alter its occurrence. Or do we receive the “message” when it can no longer be altered? So I was just thinking. For example, I have something scheduled at noon. It takes me an hour to get there. I have two messages, “go” and “don’t go.” Would I receive a message before or after 11? How would I know that the message is for this appointment rather than one in the future or one that already occurred? In this case, I know something is going to happen at noon. But what if I didn’t know, but SyncTXT “messages” me. Just rambling. =) Have a great day all!
5. By Niv on January 14 2010 at 14:28 (2:28 PM) ET Well for me it seems to be when something has already become a sure thing. I'll get messages that are triggered by some ones attention towards me or on a subject related to me. What makes me sure of this is that fact that I will get msgs about someone before or after they have contacted me. I sometimes even get messages goading me in a certain course of action. But am not sure of what to typically make of those so I often ignore them. One thing I find to be Q is from was point in time do our messages come from? Psi got a message from days into the future. Dean Rayden talked about REG's sending out signals hours before the 9/11 attacks. It almost makes me wonder if the messages we think are misses or just make not sense to the situation are actually related to that event or the coarse of action prescribed for a desired future, from that future. Am I talking crazy?
6. By JV625 on January 16 2010 at 11:34 (11:34 AM) ET Niv: I think that if one considers/accepts the empirical work on "RetroPK," (e.g. someone in the present influencing an REG whose data was generated in the past but not yet observed), they do have to be open to your possibility of some "future" influencing the outcome of alerts. So, I'd say it isn't crazy - at least not as far as these (already crazy!) effects go. However, my hunch from this work is that we're not dealing with a situation where time can be thought of in a linear way, with well-defined pasts flowing into determined futures. Rather, we may be working with something that has more of an "hour-glass" shape to it, with a (relatively) constrained/well-defined present that is linked to probabilistic pasts and futures. So, if we accept that there is something to them, where do the alerts come from? My guess would be "everywhere" (contributions from various "pasts" and "futures"), but in a way that is weighted by the consciousness of the present observer.
7. By TheArchitect on January 26 2010 at 11:19 (11:19 AM) ET Re JV625: Very interested in your "hour-glass" shape theory. Anywhere I could read more about it? What do you think it is that constrains those probabilistic pasts and futures?
8. By Psylernaut on April 19 2010 at 22:38 (10:38 PM) ET Re TheArchitect: http://books.google.com/books?id=2egMR9TXk0MC&printsec=frontcover&dq=morehouse+%22remote+viewing%22+time+diagram&source=bl&ots=Pm_P-kexWX&sig=JlkJDRhiAS78iih5MmIiVuonE9M&hl=en&ei=PhPNS5TbEonwsgOEmeivDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false Go to page 69.
9. By JV625 on April 19 2010 at 22:54 (10:54 PM) ET Re TheArchitect: I don't have anywhere that you can read about it yet; but the idea would be that pasts and futures are constrained by what is acceptable to the observing consciousness in the present or by potential states in the "will be" present.
Sedona, AZ