1. By JV625 on June 17 2009 at 09:12 (9:12 AM) ET Nice! Do you relate to it as it saying that the liberated ones don't worry about the baby crying, or the liberated ones are non-attached to their own non-attachment, and so they don't worry about how well they are doing?
2. By amandabcook on June 17 2009 at 09:37 (9:37 AM) ET haha! Definitely both of those things at once. I mean, being attached to the concept of nonattachment is clearly a failure. Maybe I just need to stop monitoring myself and just go with the flow a little more. :)
3. By JV625 on June 17 2009 at 10:24 (10:24 AM) ET Haha, well yes, I guess I was alluding to a failure of perfect non-attachment in a purist sense, but I still think of it as a big success and exactly what SyncTXT is about. With perfect non-attachment (and all that goes along with it), one could probably receive great SyncTXT messages, but in another sense they’d lose most of their meaning/purpose and it would kind of obviate the point of making many of the messages in the first place!